Normally I cannot abide insipid celebrities who prattle on and on about some pet political issue. They assume the entire world really cares about their oh-so-special perspective.
There are some rare exceptions, however. Michelle Pfeiffer, Kathy Bates, and Helen Mirren all recently made public statements about how the time has come to legalize prostitution. They're right.
Of course, the first two made their remarks while promoting a classy bordello-themed feature film called
Cheri, wherein the 51-year-old Pfeiffer beds 27-year-old himbo Rupert Friend. (You go Michelle.) The movie stills I've seen look absolutely gorgeous by the way. Mirren, in turn, was hawking a prostitution-themed movie called
Love Ranch.
One argument against legalizing prostitution holds that women would be exploited if the practice were made lawful. At present, prostitutes are often at the mercy of the mobsters and gangbangers who control the trade, so I guess it never dawns on opponents that they're already seriously exploited. If the practice were made lawful and regulated like, say, the sale of tobacco or liquor, there would be mechanisms to prevent exploitation. As well, licensing fees and taxation of services could help remedy strained public coffers.
Another long-standing argument is that it will drive men out of the arms of their wives. Like that isn't already happening. Perhaps the fear of being exposed inhibits a few men from approaching streetwalkers, but that must be a very small percentage. Open up the yellow pages in any major city and you can find all sorts of gray-market prostitutes offering their "escort" services. Just ask Elliot Spitzer.
A further argument holds that legalizing prostitution would spread disease. Like that's not going to happen now either. If a prostitute had to receive regular medical checkups in order to be licensed, then the chance of disease would be lessened, not increased.
As it stands now, I can't think of a logical argument for continuing to make prostitution illegal. Sure, "family values" candidates would try to shout down attempts to change the law, but that's the discoursive equivalent of pissing in the wind. With the recent spate of "family values" candidates who have been caught getting a little on the side, I think the public should finally call bullshit on the hypocrisy and make this long-needed change.