My brother subscribes to
Harper's Magazine so I use his email address and password to read online, with his permission. Online access allows you to read their entire 169-year archive.
For the past thirty-five years, the magazine runs "Harper's Index" every month, which is a collection of interesting, odd, troubling, and sometimes infuriating statistics that usually bear no relation to no more than a few of the several dozen other listings.
These two items in the most recent Harper's Index really caught my attention. I quote verbatim:
Minimum age at which citizens of the Netherlands can request euthanasia, with their parents’ permission: 12.
Number of Dutch 12- to 17-year-olds who have requested and received euthanasia since 2005: 14.
Wow. While the total number is not on the Dutch government's
website, the other information is, including a fact not in the Harper's Index: 16- and 17-year-olds do not need parental permission.
I have no problem with consenting adults of sound mind who wish to commit suicide or be euthanized. That is their choice. Of course, they might find a hard time getting a doctor to the latter.
But I think children is a much different matter. First of all, what kind of parent would consent to their 12-year-old who wished to be euthanized?
I think the parents should move heaven and earth to see that their child receives therapy so that he or she can overcome the reasons for wishing euthanasia. Yes, the child might be severely disabled. The child might have cancer. The child might have severe depression.
But you persist. You give that child every chance to reach adulthood when he or she may then make the choice as a consenting adult.
As for 16- and 17-year-old, I do not think they have the full capacity to make a decision like this on their own. It's too big of a decision, and too final, to leave it to chance.