The BBC webpage is running a short first person
account of a reporter visiting a porn set in California.
The writer includes the unsourced claim that piracy has had a deleterious imact on the smut business. That's an oft-repeated mantra, yet the porn industry never provides any accounting proof of that allegation. One has to wonder if this is anything more than crocodile tears. One is reminded of something Stalin once said: repeating a lie often enough makes it the truth.
Here's my analogy for the industry's illogical claim: a man shoots himself in the foot on a rainy day; soon he complains the rain is causing his foot to hurt.
Yes, some piracy happens. But the porn industry also churns out a phenomenal volume of absolute shyte. At the same time, they fail almost without exception to take some easy measures to stop piracy. Some smart producers tag their online clips with unique codes, so if they're shared, the instigator is easily identified. And, some content producers also use only streaming to prevent sharing of files.
The porn business model seems squarely in the pre-online era yet complains about its economic woes in the online age. At the same time, the number of online porn outlets continues to proliferate at an exponential rate. If the business is dying, how come so many new sites keep cropping up literally every day?
When most businesses are failing, they curtail production. The porn industry would like us to believe down is up -- even though they claim to be losing money, they keep making more and more and more and more.
Hollywood movie studios claim they're losing billions to piracy. Then on another day, they churn out press releases proudly tooting about how they've had yet another record-shattering year of revenues and profits.
One can only wonder how much business is created by piracy. If someone sees a bad bootleg of a movie online, how many times do they seek out a high quality, legitimate version?