The current issue of
The Atlantic includes a fascinating
essay about Margaret Atwood and her latest book.
At the beginning, the writer includes an anecdote about how Atwood's most famous book, the modern classic
The Handmaid's Tale, was germinated:
In 1980, "Atwood was appearing at a poetry festival in Portland, Oregon, when her trip was disrupted by natural disaster: Mount St. Helens, in nearby Washington State, began erupting for the second time that spring. Plumes of volcanic ash and gas grounded all flights in Portland, and with trains booked up as well, Atwood joined forces with the poet Carolyn Forché to find a route out of town. The pair ended up driving south to San Francisco, and over the 11-hour car ride, Forché told Atwood about the horrors she’d witnessed as a Guggenheim fellow during the lead-up to the civil war in El Salvador: sexual violence, men kept in cages, torture, death squads. What was happening there, she told Atwood, was going largely unreported."
Five years after that road trip,
Handmaid was published.
The linked essay details how that trip transformed Atwood's life in important ways, a metamorphosis that resulted in her now most famous work. While the book doesn't bear any resemblance overtly to the El Salvador tragedy, you can see how that opened Atwood's eyes to the evils of totalitarianism, which ultimately inspired a massive research effort where she collected carton after cartoon of news stories about people living outside democratic societies.
Were it not for that serendipitous roadtrip, would Atwood have ever written
Handmaid? After reading the linked essay, I came away convinced she would not have. And I don't think she would have written many of her other novels, either.