Lady Muck is a common, ordinary woman who acts as if she is someone of high birth. There is a couple on our road who are classic Lord and Lady Muck types, particularly the wife. My husband refers to their slightly grander house as Muck Manor.
A few years ago, The Observer ran an interesting if not flawed essay about Lady Muck. The author erroneously refers to the Schlegel sisters in Howards End as (sic) Lady Mucks.
First of all, the plural would be Ladies Muck, not Lady Mucks. The noun is "lady" not "muck." And second, the Schlegel were real aristocrats. They were upper class by birth and quite well off with inherited wealth. They may have been snobs but neither was a Muck. I suspect the author of the linked essay saw the movie but did not read the book because you could come to this conclusion without reading the latter.
Is then the author of the linked piece a Lady Muck in her own right, tossing off the book as an example when she's clearly not familiar with her own reference? It might sound smart to someone else who hasn't read the book, but anyone who has read it will see the error in her conclusion.


























